CVE-2026-97945: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm: Fix user-space data loss with MADV_FREE and THP Some of users of Polars (a data analytics library) have lost production data from this bug. They
Cosa significa
NIST National Vulnerability Database ha pubblicato CVE-2026-97945. La rilevanza va confermata rispetto alle tecnologie effettivamente in uso.
Perché conta
Il segnale diventa operativo solo se prodotto, versione o servizio sono presenti nel perimetro.
Azioni consigliate
- Confermare l'applicabilita consultando la fonte ufficiale e l'inventario asset.
- Pianificare mitigazione o aggiornamento secondo criticita e rischio di interruzione.
Traduzione in elaborazione
Il contenuto ufficiale è disponibile nella lingua originale. La versione italiana verrà pubblicata al termine dei controlli automatici.
Testo acquisito dalla fonte
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm: Fix user-space data loss with MADV_FREE and THP Some of users of Polars (a data analytics library) have lost production data from this bug. They seem to have just the right combination of huge pages, MADV_FREE and heavy reclaim pressure. pmd_modify() masks the old value with (_HPAGE_CHG_MASK & ~_PAGE_DIRTY), silently discarding the hardware dirty bit. The subsequent pmd_mksaveddirty() call is supposed to transfer _PAGE_DIRTY into _PAGE_SAVED_DIRTY when write-protecting, but the dirty bit was already stripped from the value, so there is nothing left to transfer. Contrast with pte_modify(), which keeps _PAGE_DIRTY_BITS in its mask, and pud_modify(), which keeps _HPAGE_CHG_MASK untouched: pmd_modify() is the odd one out. Any pmd_modify() on a writable, dirty PMD loses the dirty state. One visible consequence is data loss with MADV_FREE on PMD-mapped THP: memset(buf, 0x5A, size); // PMD-mapped THP, PMD dirty madvise(buf, size, MADV_FREE); // PMD cleaned but left writable, // folio marked lazyfree memset(buf, 0x5A, size); // hardware sets _PAGE_DIRTY again mprotect(buf, size, PROT_READ); // pmd_modify() drops the dirty bit mprotect(buf, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE); // ... memory pressure ... Reclaim (e.g. under memcg pressure) then finds the lazyfree folio with no dirty bit set anywhere and frees it in __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(), even though the data was rewritten after MADV_FREE; subsequent reads fault in fresh zero pages. NUMA hinting alone can trigger the same loss, as do_huge_pmd_numa_page() restores the PMD through pmd_modify() as well. PMD-mapped file THPs are affected too: mprotect()/NUMA hinting dropping the dirty bit means rewritten data is never written back. Fix it by keeping _PAGE_
- Fonte
- NIST National Vulnerability Database
- Entità pubblicatrice
- NIST National Vulnerability Database
- Tipo entità
- Autorità nazionale
- Area
- North America · US
- Lingua originale
- en · traduzione in preparazione
- Pubblicazione
- 25/09/2026 13:17
- CVE
- CVE-2026-97945
- Paese indicato
- US
Prodotti e versioni interessati
Le fonti ufficiali interrogate non espongono ancora un elenco di versioni interessate. Non viene effettuata alcuna deduzione automatica.